If I’m going to run bitwarden_rs and mysql in separate containers (using docker compose), do I use the server-mysql image, or do I use the server image and just change the DATABASE_URL setting?
Related confusion:
Docker Hub images have the same dockerfile
I’m pretty new to Docker, etc, so maybe this isn’t an issue.
When I look at the individual Docker Hub pages for the bitwarden_rs images with different back ends, I expect to see different contents on the “Dockerfile” tab. This makes me think that the mysql and postgres images aren’t built correctly.
Compare:
The PostgreSQL one is the same, but as a new user I can only post two links.
hi, could you explain what your excact command was to install the bitwardenrs/server-postgresql docker container?
I can’t make it work, it doesn’t start up. it just says container is restarting.
this is my command:
I see you are still using the latest tag. That has been changed to testing.
Also, the most recent versions of the bitwardenrs/server:testing container has multi-database support now, and can be used for sqlite3, mysql/mariadb and postgresql.
I don’t see anything strange in this command. What do you see in the bitwarden.log file located at /home/bitwarden_rs/? Or try docker logs -f --details bitwarden_rs and see what output you get there.
Thanks for the reply! Actually, I havent tried again since then. Maybe using the testing tag would have already solved the problem but I think I will be fine using the sqllite version. Thanks!
Hi,
I’m trying to use bitwarden_rs and docker with MySQL support. I have an issue with MySQL, and I can’t find any server-mysql tags from Docker Hub.
Is this image still available ? Or I must use another image ?
Thank you !
Thank you !
And is the testing version “stable” for everyday use ? And it will be possible to go from testing to latest when it will be available ?
Thank you !